Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-27 22:43:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D3981F3482AF39956008BC3BA4516981A031DBD98545B6CCFF5B94BF19614EA
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/b723/05prej/T05.pdf The note about prejudice does not accurately reflect this source. There is no "factually incorrect" category for barring an argument, and the jury, not the judge, is the finder of fact. If evidence of a defense can be presented, it goes to the jury.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740086514871128473
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1D3981F3482AF39956008BC3BA4516981A031DBD98545B6CCFF5B94BF19614EA
  • createdAtMillis - 1703717011526
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17400865148711284731D3981F3482AF39956008BC3BA4516981A031DBD98545B6CCFF5B94BF19614EA