Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-27 23:20:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F822A35DD420DFEB8FD954E601BDFDEBA204B1D053404474ADD7CFD75AC294E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The poster is attempting to mislead readers by insinuating the barring of "evidence" as unprecedented or wrong. Rule 403, The Prejudice Rule, states when attempting to bombard the court with evidence with purpose to delay, waste time, or mislead, the evidence can be excluded. https://law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/b723/05prej/T05.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740075447361085724
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F822A35DD420DFEB8FD954E601BDFDEBA204B1D053404474ADD7CFD75AC294E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1703719250351
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1740075447361085724F822A35DD420DFEB8FD954E601BDFDEBA204B1D053404474ADD7CFD75AC294E6