Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-27 18:32:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F69EE9E68043BBCA4FDC16801F02387CEF79C4CAA44F67AB21418E48400F7C38
Participant Details

Original Note:

The poster is attempting to mislead readers by insinuating the barring of "evidence" as unprecedented or wrong. Rule 403, The Prejudice Rule, states when attempting to bombard the court with evidence with purpose to delay, waste time, or mislead, the evidence can be excluded. https://law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/b723/05prej/T05.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740075447361085724
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F69EE9E68043BBCA4FDC16801F02387CEF79C4CAA44F67AB21418E48400F7C38
  • createdAtMillis - 1703701966759
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1740075447361085724F69EE9E68043BBCA4FDC16801F02387CEF79C4CAA44F67AB21418E48400F7C38