Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-27 23:18:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E5686F7FE6F2E5F04BDB8FBFD012AD5AC5208B0B50BCF485E9F0525F2DE5013
Participant Details

Original Note:

The poster is attempting to mislead readers by insinuating the barring of "evidence" as unprecedented or wrong. Rule 403, The Prejudice Rule, states when attempting to bombard the court with evidence with purpose to delay, waste time, or mislead, the evidence can be excluded. https://law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/b723/05prej/T05.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740074830035128665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E5686F7FE6F2E5F04BDB8FBFD012AD5AC5208B0B50BCF485E9F0525F2DE5013
  • createdAtMillis - 1703719117533
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17400748300351286652E5686F7FE6F2E5F04BDB8FBFD012AD5AC5208B0B50BCF485E9F0525F2DE5013