Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-28 07:30:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22FE524D2C2393C30EEA72520C0C67CF69C3B92FD2A25E9462F460133648C6B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The poster is attempting to mislead readers by insinuating the barring of "evidence" as unprecedented or wrong. Rule 403, The Prejudice Rule, states when attempting to bombard the court with evidence with purpose to delay, waste time, or mislead, the evidence can be excluded. https://law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/b723/05prej/T05.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740074830035128665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 22FE524D2C2393C30EEA72520C0C67CF69C3B92FD2A25E9462F460133648C6B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1703748614367
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174007483003512866522FE524D2C2393C30EEA72520C0C67CF69C3B92FD2A25E9462F460133648C6B6