Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-02 02:12:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B4AA2212A0A001FA1EB6B2B8551FE056196C28A02134C5DD525A24D32835C0EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. There is no need to explain that these pieces cited are "opinion" -- that is clear from the excerpts themselves. The appropriate place to argue the significance of these being "opinion" pieces is in the comments, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740046852660293779
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B4AA2212A0A001FA1EB6B2B8551FE056196C28A02134C5DD525A24D32835C0EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1704161564934
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1740046852660293779B4AA2212A0A001FA1EB6B2B8551FE056196C28A02134C5DD525A24D32835C0EC