Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-27 11:26:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F44144B6FF1E53568DBC46F3C6B9B7C9FCB0EAE64E7D8691D9B24B398365527
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le jugement est public : http://paris.tribunal-administratif.fr/content/download/214281/2035952/version/1/file/2111821.anon_compl.pdf Anticor n'étant pas (encore ?) en règle sur ses sources de financement, condition de transparence obligatoire pour l'obtention de l'agrément, celui-ci lui a logiquement été refusé par le tribunal administratif.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1739947331938639946
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F44144B6FF1E53568DBC46F3C6B9B7C9FCB0EAE64E7D8691D9B24B398365527
  • createdAtMillis - 1703676404057
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17399473319386399465F44144B6FF1E53568DBC46F3C6B9B7C9FCB0EAE64E7D8691D9B24B398365527