Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-27 09:43:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FB41F90EAA663E231819F95EE1DF7B630536D0ECAF3C1F44E1B4ED15A4893C23
Participant Details

Original Note:

ピンク・レディ事件はパブリシティ権の侵害となる要件を定めた判例ではあるものの パブリシティ権の侵害には当たらないと原告の訴えを退けています https://t.co/1YVdFwp90F?s=09

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1739867672136016096
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FB41F90EAA663E231819F95EE1DF7B630536D0ECAF3C1F44E1B4ED15A4893C23
  • createdAtMillis - 1703670182223
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1739867672136016096FB41F90EAA663E231819F95EE1DF7B630536D0ECAF3C1F44E1B4ED15A4893C23