Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-27 06:10:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B996A585F2A81325BFBC9102AA7CC8C4550F7C9AA98782F5AD9E80A4A2AD0112
Participant Details

Original Note:

実際には昨年出版された最新のランダム化比較試験のメタアナリシスでもインフルエンザワクチンは対照群と比べ試験条件で一定の有効性が示されていることに注意が必要です。 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(22)00061-X/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1739861873271701517
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B996A585F2A81325BFBC9102AA7CC8C4550F7C9AA98782F5AD9E80A4A2AD0112
  • createdAtMillis - 1703657408527
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1739861873271701517B996A585F2A81325BFBC9102AA7CC8C4550F7C9AA98782F5AD9E80A4A2AD0112