Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-27 00:39:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2676F1D09B2658DBDEEF4D34FCD1B338A90EB57E5851BAA425CEC3AD70687E28
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Shroud of Turin is not "definitively proven" to be a medieval forgery, as the validity of the results due to issues with the samples used to obtain them has been heavily criticized, even by the head of chemical research of the original carbon-dating project team. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating_of_the_Shroud_of_Turin#Criticisms_of_the_test_results

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1739806420017521039
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2676F1D09B2658DBDEEF4D34FCD1B338A90EB57E5851BAA425CEC3AD70687E28
  • createdAtMillis - 1703637546479
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17398064200175210392676F1D09B2658DBDEEF4D34FCD1B338A90EB57E5851BAA425CEC3AD70687E28