Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-24 17:16:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DACDC267E26E3F69EF5E1B53E89C7A14D768052FE3B191A111FC4C31C0175D4B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Obviously "great replacement" rhetoric is idiotic and hilariously wrong, but this tweet is too vague to be factually disputed. There are already plenty of replies rightfully making fun of this guy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1738968851461583085
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DACDC267E26E3F69EF5E1B53E89C7A14D768052FE3B191A111FC4C31C0175D4B
  • createdAtMillis - 1703438207821
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1738968851461583085DACDC267E26E3F69EF5E1B53E89C7A14D768052FE3B191A111FC4C31C0175D4B