Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-03 13:11:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7E7A2DF3DD0571DA2724B340472A087BB383251A74BF191C9C521ABF7983ED02
Participant Details

Original Note:

最高裁判所は法律審であり、事実関係は事実審である下級審の認定内容に基づいて判断されます。 https://www.courts.go.jp/saikosai/tetuzuki/index.html https://kotobank.jp/word/%E6%B3%95%E5%BE%8B%E5%AF%A9-132508 https://murakawa-law.jp/pages/52/detail=1/b_id=190/r_id=6/ https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/special/kokuminshinsa/about005.html よって、事実認定に不服を申し立てても最高裁判所は聞き入れません。 判決の修正には下級審の認定事実に対する法令や判例の適用に違反していることが必要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1738808301784268820
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7E7A2DF3DD0571DA2724B340472A087BB383251A74BF191C9C521ABF7983ED02
  • createdAtMillis - 1727961107779
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17388083017842688207E7A2DF3DD0571DA2724B340472A087BB383251A74BF191C9C521ABF7983ED02