Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-04 06:25:51 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F5CEC9D0D4DA22021CD5BCB4F61CC5479FFE08D0D48B8E34005A9A00AC91219
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10072076/ There is a valid line of inquiry regarding amyloidogenic or prionergic epitopes. Any epidemiological proof would take years to fully manifest. EDR is again abusing CN to suggest there's *no* issue. That isn't known, it may yet become a substantial issue.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1738746522999849308
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F5CEC9D0D4DA22021CD5BCB4F61CC5479FFE08D0D48B8E34005A9A00AC91219
  • createdAtMillis - 1704349551563
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17387465229998493080F5CEC9D0D4DA22021CD5BCB4F61CC5479FFE08D0D48B8E34005A9A00AC91219