Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-12-23 23:19:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D583EB3D73E1FFA1A97ECD94253DCBBF34E7DB0492C41A3417A38E94C2A1EA3F
Participant Details
Original Note:
The tweet and headline are misleading as to the court’s ruling. The court merely denied X’s motion to dismiss, meaning that the employees stated a viable claim that may proceed to discovery. The court did not rule that X violated contracts. https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/12b6-failure-to-state-a-claim/ https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/schobinger-v-twitter-order.pdf
All Note Details