Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-12-23 23:37:58 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 9D56EBB9E5CADD5F48318FD5E6707B4DEA85C0A58C8727AC6578696C50B5E236
Participant Details
Original Note:
The tweet and headline are misleading as to the court’s ruling. The court merely denied X’s motion to dismiss, meaning that the employees stated a viable claim that may proceed to discovery. The court did not rule that X violated contracts. https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/12b6-failure-to-state-a-claim/ https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/schobinger-v-twitter-order.pdf
All Note Details