Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-12-23 22:43:32 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 867F9F6417CC277118EB71471E6678C4751F1A414F1BB9942E66F26656E397B3
Participant Details
Original Note:
The tweet and headline are misleading as to the court’s ruling. The court merely denied X’s motion to dismiss, meaning that the employees stated a viable claim that may proceed to discovery. The court did not rule that X violated contracts. https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/12b6-failure-to-state-a-claim/ https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/schobinger-v-twitter-order.pdf
All Note Details