Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-12-24 02:59:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 525F48499A13FDECE64364A16F8ACCBE43B5CD0500AD5FAB4478E2FE78A9C7C7
Participant Details
Original Note:
The tweet and headline are misleading as to the court’s ruling. The court merely denied X’s motion to dismiss, meaning that the employees stated a viable claim that may proceed to discovery. The court did not rule that X violated contracts. https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/12b6-failure-to-state-a-claim/ https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/schobinger-v-twitter-order.pdf
All Note Details