Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-12-23 22:53:19 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E1E292023ABF6752824A74B0D47AC9B2DB90FB43C3A4D7E515F3502FEA703433
Participant Details
Original Note:
The characters they claim the person liked are not real children and can not be construed as actual child porn. Art of fictional characters, as long as they do not depict an actual flesh and blood child, are protected under free speech per SCOTUS. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/535/234/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/sexual-exploitation-policy
All Note Details