Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-12-23 20:01:45 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 86FA8DF93CEC53F80C78A65F88DFB6FCF406192919C3129716053C8FF45EDC68
Participant Details
Original Note:
The characters they claim the person liked are not real children and can not be construed as actual child porn. Art of fictional characters, as long as they do not depict an actual flesh and blood child, are protected under free speech per SCOTUS. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/535/234/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/sexual-exploitation-policy
All Note Details