Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-22 21:40:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07F78F53D64169633041A360A2B3A05A9912238ECECCD46D1F953E60091AA411
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet only reproduces text from the abstract of a scientific review article published recently (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37445690/), which has been subjected to due peer review process (https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/13/10514/review_report). The claim as well as opinion are of the author, who is mentioned to be an independent researcher.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1738263078070837423
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07F78F53D64169633041A360A2B3A05A9912238ECECCD46D1F953E60091AA411
  • createdAtMillis - 1703281258093
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173826307807083742307F78F53D64169633041A360A2B3A05A9912238ECECCD46D1F953E60091AA411