Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-22 15:32:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 24F1C2FC5C49DBC7110A6198E15FA9445157D292B1273CE697C8021645F2E353
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le terme "inaction climatique" n'apparait pas dans le jugement définitif du tribunal de Paris. Il s'agit d'une expression marketing inventée par ces associations. L'Etat a été condamné pour des "carences" en matière de lutte contre le changement climatique. Jugement : http://paris.tribunal-administratif.fr/content/download/184990/1788790/version/1/file/1904967BIS.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1738149655995646245
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 24F1C2FC5C49DBC7110A6198E15FA9445157D292B1273CE697C8021645F2E353
  • createdAtMillis - 1703259166739
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173814965599564624524F1C2FC5C49DBC7110A6198E15FA9445157D292B1273CE697C8021645F2E353