Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-22 09:18:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66D97BD757AB4D440B2B23FC491A3B5C9D021BC72EA90E4223596407D0B87CA8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Aussage wurde als Frage gestellt. Also als unbestätigte Behauptung und soll zu Spekulationen führen. Es ist keine wissenschaftliche Aussage. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-redefined-the-idea-of-2-sexes-is-overly-simplistic1/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1738084611257725351
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 66D97BD757AB4D440B2B23FC491A3B5C9D021BC72EA90E4223596407D0B87CA8
  • createdAtMillis - 1703236713746
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173808461125772535166D97BD757AB4D440B2B23FC491A3B5C9D021BC72EA90E4223596407D0B87CA8