Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-22 07:22:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57A990770474E751FF60931618C86D24EE5971C74F78326449BCDDA9C4556053
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Aussage wurde als Frage gestellt. Also als unbestätigte Behauptung und soll zu Spekulationen führen. Es ist keine wissenschaftliche Aussage. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-redefined-the-idea-of-2-sexes-is-overly-simplistic1/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1738084611257725351
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57A990770474E751FF60931618C86D24EE5971C74F78326449BCDDA9C4556053
  • createdAtMillis - 1703229720339
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 173808461125772535157A990770474E751FF60931618C86D24EE5971C74F78326449BCDDA9C4556053