Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-12-22 03:01:30 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 979EEB0833B7DD268F71EC45C553AE5B8F9D20162E49E531A233EE605C94C0D9
Participant Details
Original Note:
In his dissent, Justice Carlos Samour observed that this procedure was not a trial, but instead a "makeshift proceeding... which lacked basic discovery, the ability to subpoena documents and compel witnesses [and] workable timeframes to... develop defenses." https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf
All Note Details