Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-12-22 02:59:30 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 049E9E249CF132BD220934A2301413303C9F83D5CC0D861A6488BB5A903CCA42
Participant Details
Original Note:
In his dissent, Justice Carlos Samour observed that this procedure was not a trial, but instead a "makeshift proceeding... which lacked basic discovery, the ability to subpoena documents and compel witnesses [and] workable timeframes to... develop defenses." https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf
All Note Details