Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-22 01:08:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7800260635C3AFD1F93205075F3603D9C8AA34F0CEA2AD694A5F25A5D1AA45F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case before the Supreme Court referred to is not his case. It does not include Jake Lang as a petitioner. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/fischer-v-united-states/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1737960719033790725
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7800260635C3AFD1F93205075F3603D9C8AA34F0CEA2AD694A5F25A5D1AA45F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1703207286547
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17379607190337907257800260635C3AFD1F93205075F3603D9C8AA34F0CEA2AD694A5F25A5D1AA45F7