Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-21 23:26:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9FB04979552B031F37F8665DFE2BEB62EF2405EC524F65196F6BE4C9B4D7DFCC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Intelligent Design is not science. Wikipedia calls it pseudoscience with good reason, it's an argument about religion couched in science terms. No scientific results are based on ID, or derived from it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1737944960005984589
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9FB04979552B031F37F8665DFE2BEB62EF2405EC524F65196F6BE4C9B4D7DFCC
  • createdAtMillis - 1703201194432
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17379449600059845899FB04979552B031F37F8665DFE2BEB62EF2405EC524F65196F6BE4C9B4D7DFCC