Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-22 07:54:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5DAD3F2DADF034C530A390A5A8291C8593292735C27060AD3A0E70EDED15BD61
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP is factually correct. EDR’s citations show that process 1 and process 2 products were compared analytically. EDR has provided no evidence of a clinical comparison (the subject of the OP). Yet again EDR is acting in bad faith and attempting to mislead.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1737883999622611019
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5DAD3F2DADF034C530A390A5A8291C8593292735C27060AD3A0E70EDED15BD61
  • createdAtMillis - 1703231675549
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17378839996226110195DAD3F2DADF034C530A390A5A8291C8593292735C27060AD3A0E70EDED15BD61