Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-30 01:34:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59D78E57BD54EBCA6F13FB54D1CE13EB54C904570B07128C57C5D371F1DAB670
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post is opinion on a case that is still active in the courts. The state court's opinion as cited by the proposed CN is the latest in the chain of appeals and reversals. It is likely to be appealed again to the US Supreme Court and so there is no final ruling worthy of a CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1737600553327464589
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59D78E57BD54EBCA6F13FB54D1CE13EB54C904570B07128C57C5D371F1DAB670
  • createdAtMillis - 1703900074804
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173760055332746458959D78E57BD54EBCA6F13FB54D1CE13EB54C904570B07128C57C5D371F1DAB670