Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-20 17:20:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71B4B4CA393718884E3EC8C8963C94EEEA25B93BDD2405702ED9D9C9C5FC016D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. And for fu*ks sake don't refer to Britannica as a reliable source for democracy!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1737512892470042852
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71B4B4CA393718884E3EC8C8963C94EEEA25B93BDD2405702ED9D9C9C5FC016D
  • createdAtMillis - 1703092814607
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173751289247004285271B4B4CA393718884E3EC8C8963C94EEEA25B93BDD2405702ED9D9C9C5FC016D