Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-20 11:46:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58727A220E2718E2321C7C7F86E9DC8F04B4A5C6C48EB0333FDB97272BFFBAA7
Participant Details

Original Note:

En fait, le texte aurait été tout de même été adopté si les parlementaires du RN s’étaient abstenus, mais pas s’ils avaient voté contre. https://www.lemonde.fr/politique/live/2023/12/19/en-direct-projet-de-loi-immigration-l-assemblee-nationale-adopte-le-projet-de-loi-immigration-a-349-voix-pour-et-186-contre_6206507_823448.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1737367593328025861
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58727A220E2718E2321C7C7F86E9DC8F04B4A5C6C48EB0333FDB97272BFFBAA7
  • createdAtMillis - 1703072780369
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173736759332802586158727A220E2718E2321C7C7F86E9DC8F04B4A5C6C48EB0333FDB97272BFFBAA7