Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-20 09:15:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17205A8D0C31E1983E1E818799A348D0E76BFC88D7D607F3A5ECF81FCBAB5E4B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le texte aurait été rejeté si le RN avait voté contre (274 contre, 261 pour). Il a donc été voté grâce au soutien du RN, dont il n'aurait pas pu se passer. https://www.lemonde.fr/politique/live/2023/12/19/en-direct-projet-de-loi-immigration-l-assemblee-nationale-adopte-le-projet-de-loi-immigration-a-349-voix-pour-et-186-contre_6206507_823448.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1737268009385828489
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17205A8D0C31E1983E1E818799A348D0E76BFC88D7D607F3A5ECF81FCBAB5E4B
  • createdAtMillis - 1703063717882
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173726800938582848917205A8D0C31E1983E1E818799A348D0E76BFC88D7D607F3A5ECF81FCBAB5E4B