Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-24 05:33:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC0638F487FE480328038D8E6A43D21039EC7286A7F0CD062E87CF0C90247D9C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Oelrich was instead speaking about how the acceptance of a biotech innovation like mRNA COVID-19 vaccines was an example of how cell and gene therapies, another biotech innovation, could be received by the public. He didn't call mRNA vaccines gene therapy. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N2YF1AI/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1737231746276499880
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC0638F487FE480328038D8E6A43D21039EC7286A7F0CD062E87CF0C90247D9C
  • createdAtMillis - 1703396023659
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1737231746276499880EC0638F487FE480328038D8E6A43D21039EC7286A7F0CD062E87CF0C90247D9C