Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-20 18:03:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59138A5AF711F1610E9F7DF12303E68B953C5A5D398308B12425323F60B57F38
Participant Details

Original Note:

Oelrich was instead speaking about how the acceptance of a biotech innovation like mRNA COVID-19 vaccines was an example of how cell and gene therapies, another biotech innovation, could be received by the public. He didn't call mRNA vaccines gene therapy. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N2YF1AI/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1737231746276499880
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59138A5AF711F1610E9F7DF12303E68B953C5A5D398308B12425323F60B57F38
  • createdAtMillis - 1703095405216
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 173723174627649988059138A5AF711F1610E9F7DF12303E68B953C5A5D398308B12425323F60B57F38