Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-20 12:19:45 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 13A6D5C883FBA049C4243046560B06A5CD5D6074964735602E8D92F16D733CBE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Oelrich was instead speaking about how the acceptance of a biotech innovation like mRNA COVID-19 vaccines was an example of how cell and gene therapies, another biotech innovation, could be received by the public. He didn't call mRNA vaccines gene therapy. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N2YF1AI/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1737231746276499880
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 13A6D5C883FBA049C4243046560B06A5CD5D6074964735602E8D92F16D733CBE
  • createdAtMillis - 1703074785552
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173723174627649988013A6D5C883FBA049C4243046560B06A5CD5D6074964735602E8D92F16D733CBE