Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 22:30:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 837E94B73F20865791415197C955BE08CB4A5576CD1EB12042E8D3D78D82120C
Participant Details

Original Note:

"A meta-analysis is only as good as the studies in it" https://methods.cochrane.org/sites/methods.cochrane.org.statistics/files/uploads/SMGworkshopsEdinburgh/10_intro_meta-analysis.pdf This meta-analysis includes studies with high bias, multiple interventions, retrospective, observational and even a literal survey: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34781604/ Making this a garbage meta-analysis with high bias and misleading results.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1736894434862878814
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 837E94B73F20865791415197C955BE08CB4A5576CD1EB12042E8D3D78D82120C
  • createdAtMillis - 1704839459862
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1736894434862878814837E94B73F20865791415197C955BE08CB4A5576CD1EB12042E8D3D78D82120C