Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-18 19:36:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 794B3D95097BB657E2B497808008EB2A157FC9458BB959841A3363AD09984B2D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Pures affabulations. Il n'est nulle part question de "faire payer le CO2", mais de réguler la prolifération de population animale. Il n'est nulle part prévu de culpabiliser les détenteurs d'animaux, ni de les interdire ; et encore moins de rendre les gens "obéissant". https://www.journaldequebec.com/2023/12/12/taxe-sur-les-chats-quebec-suit-lexemple-des-autres-grandes-villes-quebecoises

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1736828357776392288
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 794B3D95097BB657E2B497808008EB2A157FC9458BB959841A3363AD09984B2D
  • createdAtMillis - 1702928170467
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1736828357776392288794B3D95097BB657E2B497808008EB2A157FC9458BB959841A3363AD09984B2D