Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-18 20:30:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00F0326875492DFFBA00B01777A90F665E3CE99A37AABAA157C6724C623CAA94
Participant Details

Original Note:

Pures affabulations. Il n'est nulle part question de "faire payer le CO2", mais de réguler la prolifération de population animale. Il n'est nulle part prévu de culpabiliser les détenteurs d'animaux, ni de les interdire ; et encore moins de rendre les gens "obéissant". https://www.journaldequebec.com/2023/12/12/taxe-sur-les-chats-quebec-suit-lexemple-des-autres-grandes-villes-quebecoises

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1736828357776392288
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00F0326875492DFFBA00B01777A90F665E3CE99A37AABAA157C6724C623CAA94
  • createdAtMillis - 1702931415345
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173682835777639228800F0326875492DFFBA00B01777A90F665E3CE99A37AABAA157C6724C623CAA94