Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-18 01:33:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39098B807166CFA2C2A9039AB33C8CA5923108DED92D5889369333559F432422
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N3721KC/ Reliable media has own opinion

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1736532792526225707
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39098B807166CFA2C2A9039AB33C8CA5923108DED92D5889369333559F432422
  • createdAtMillis - 1702863184212
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173653279252622570739098B807166CFA2C2A9039AB33C8CA5923108DED92D5889369333559F432422