Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-21 14:22:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3085F7776510C9D1D0086FAA703029AD0695AE4987664F9F93E85A2AE5505FF1
Participant Details

Original Note:

この調査は感染歴を含め自覚や自己評価・何年も前の記憶・自己申告により全ての調査を頼っており、調査者も予防策の重要性を否定するものではないと非常に強く念押ししています↓ https://www.kao.com/jp/kaonokao/dna/2_1/ 例えば観察研究なれば自覚や記憶ではなく実際の検査による感染証明や臨床診断を調べた研究のメタアナリシスによりマスクのインフルエンザへの効果は厳格に頑健に示されてます↓ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893920302301 同じく手洗いとマスクのコンビのインフルエンザへの効果はランダム化比較試験のメタ解析でも示されています↓ https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/hand-hygiene-and-risk-of-influenza-virus-infections-in-the-community-a-systematic-review-and-metaanalysis/6756C5600F18C0487CA379AAB773F3F8

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1736381781837013414
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3085F7776510C9D1D0086FAA703029AD0695AE4987664F9F93E85A2AE5505FF1
  • createdAtMillis - 1703168564766
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17363817818370134143085F7776510C9D1D0086FAA703029AD0695AE4987664F9F93E85A2AE5505FF1