Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-18 01:53:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36AC3B45EF89299540D49D8F9AFFE8939ABB606E24F3E1FCA0C6502921968321
Participant Details

Original Note:

The insurance case post-9/11 was a complex legal matter where insurers paid out to rebuild the site. The suggestion of ‘insurance fraud’ lacks evidence and is disputed by the involved parties and court findings. https://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20070527/ISSUE01/100022003/silverstein-insurers-settle-wtc-claims

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1736338900396765384
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36AC3B45EF89299540D49D8F9AFFE8939ABB606E24F3E1FCA0C6502921968321
  • createdAtMillis - 1702864385884
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173633890039676538436AC3B45EF89299540D49D8F9AFFE8939ABB606E24F3E1FCA0C6502921968321