Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-17 16:35:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D4EFDDADEEE9074A01FAA3D7C6524DD9301A52DA84C831C8B7FBE442E7B3639
Participant Details

Original Note:

The insurance case post-9/11 was a complex legal matter where insurers paid out to rebuild the site. The suggestion of ‘insurance fraud’ lacks evidence and is disputed by the involved parties and court findings. https://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20070527/ISSUE01/100022003/silverstein-insurers-settle-wtc-claims

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1736338900396765384
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D4EFDDADEEE9074A01FAA3D7C6524DD9301A52DA84C831C8B7FBE442E7B3639
  • createdAtMillis - 1702830906731
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17363389003967653840D4EFDDADEEE9074A01FAA3D7C6524DD9301A52DA84C831C8B7FBE442E7B3639