Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-17 13:56:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9181C58B5BB65E53ABFB27F8CEA92199E64D9D882BE8924BCFB84E7CAA032CBB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Harvard Law Review article says that the blackletter rule *was* clear “until well into the 20th century.” In 1952, the Supreme Court, in Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, held that prohibiting speech on the basis of it being sacrilegious violated the 1st Amendment. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/343/495

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1736174910534222195
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9181C58B5BB65E53ABFB27F8CEA92199E64D9D882BE8924BCFB84E7CAA032CBB
  • createdAtMillis - 1702821362380
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17361749105342221959181C58B5BB65E53ABFB27F8CEA92199E64D9D882BE8924BCFB84E7CAA032CBB