Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-17 03:28:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8CE2813E875E38D0537BEF7978DB087670EEDEDF11CD5564110DE5FC4B62DD2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Harvard Law Review article says that the blackletter rule *was* clear “until well into the 20th century.” In 1952, the Supreme Court, in Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, held that prohibiting speech on the basis of it being sacrilegious violated the 1st Amendment. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/343/495

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1736174910534222195
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8CE2813E875E38D0537BEF7978DB087670EEDEDF11CD5564110DE5FC4B62DD2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1702783710689
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17361749105342221958CE2813E875E38D0537BEF7978DB087670EEDEDF11CD5564110DE5FC4B62DD2F