Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-17 14:05:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22E4975A6E638A39CD60BDD01DB5B73B37A81579E1570BEBFC04E10912576C01
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Harvard Law Review article says that the blackletter rule *was* clear “until well into the 20th century.” In 1952, the Supreme Court, in Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, held that prohibiting speech on the basis of it being sacrilegious violated the 1st Amendment. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/343/495

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1736174910534222195
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 22E4975A6E638A39CD60BDD01DB5B73B37A81579E1570BEBFC04E10912576C01
  • createdAtMillis - 1702821905683
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173617491053422219522E4975A6E638A39CD60BDD01DB5B73B37A81579E1570BEBFC04E10912576C01