Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-17 09:14:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C203D28E80F9F4EF865C2E4DF32B4A07F03AC76130EF3582899E1690D18F4872
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - It is still deadnaming, also claiming that it was an "innocent mistake" is speculation. Deadnaming also does not have to be intentional. Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadnaming

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1736163661243121973
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C203D28E80F9F4EF865C2E4DF32B4A07F03AC76130EF3582899E1690D18F4872
  • createdAtMillis - 1702804472031
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1736163661243121973C203D28E80F9F4EF865C2E4DF32B4A07F03AC76130EF3582899E1690D18F4872