Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-17 09:29:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 90FC2948B56E7B38D73F50732EF438E05A0846C387FEECE90EBAF284F091EC99
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - It is still deadnaming, also claiming that it was an "innocent mistake" is speculation. Deadnaming also does not have to be intentional. Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadnaming

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1736163661243121973
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 90FC2948B56E7B38D73F50732EF438E05A0846C387FEECE90EBAF284F091EC99
  • createdAtMillis - 1702805366102
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173616366124312197390FC2948B56E7B38D73F50732EF438E05A0846C387FEECE90EBAF284F091EC99