Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-16 23:56:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0FD64BCFAE97E325A88049E3AF36881C6C1E5DE3EEEC8C547925933A26CEAD49
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - It is still deadnaming, also claiming that it was an "innocent mistake" is speculation. Deadnaming also does not have to be intentional. Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadnaming

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1736163661243121973
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0FD64BCFAE97E325A88049E3AF36881C6C1E5DE3EEEC8C547925933A26CEAD49
  • createdAtMillis - 1702770986954
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17361636612431219730FD64BCFAE97E325A88049E3AF36881C6C1E5DE3EEEC8C547925933A26CEAD49