Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-17 07:09:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AE90DC386E18433F6E2F255EB5D4DE55D4BA7A01D002C85E5B6A658E74C0C0A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

All variants are based on the original. If you can refute the Japanese researchers referenced in the OP, do it in the comments. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1736108131027972496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AE90DC386E18433F6E2F255EB5D4DE55D4BA7A01D002C85E5B6A658E74C0C0A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1702796992257
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1736108131027972496AE90DC386E18433F6E2F255EB5D4DE55D4BA7A01D002C85E5B6A658E74C0C0A5