Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-16 13:59:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E2721E4932B7B5E1E4E9EC9B447EB4A915B05F059F331FD611A4B57FDF9169C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Video is CGI and in no way real https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2N2WP22T/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1735986623102202191
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E2721E4932B7B5E1E4E9EC9B447EB4A915B05F059F331FD611A4B57FDF9169C
  • createdAtMillis - 1702735174522
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17359866231022021914E2721E4932B7B5E1E4E9EC9B447EB4A915B05F059F331FD611A4B57FDF9169C